ABOUT / MY ART BLOG
s

high quality nothing

daecay:

jadedfalling:

unfriendlyindigenoushottie:

my grandfather is a residential school survivor. he literally has a BRAND of a number on his shoulder. he was a 6 year old child who was branded like a cow. he was given a new last name (he doesn’t even know his real last name) and was essentially brain washed into being white. the man, a full oglala lakota, doesn’t even call himself native anymore because he was beaten into being ashamed of it.  

do yall wanna tell me why it’s okay for you to dress up and play “indian” whenever less than 70 years ago, we were literally beaten and killed for being indian?

Be aware of this

The last residential school in Canada closed in 1996. Barely more than two decades ago. 

(via luigiruquez)

quickweaves:

wetorturedsomefolks:

scotchtapeofficial:

if ur dealing to the people on the left you’d just say “$45 a gram” and theyd be like “yeah bro sure dude i gotchu thats legitness ur the man” but the ppl on the right u gotta finesse like “my normal price is $15 a g but this stuff is called Cosmic Throat Cum Squirt Haze so the lowest i can go is $50″ and theyd b like “wow… so cultured… i cant wait to smoke this out of my native american themed bong…”

finally some accuracy on this post

Wow

(via luigiruquez)

“Should parents read their daughter’s texts or monitor her online activity for bad language and inappropriate content?”

itsme98z:

shapeshiftingray:

daeranilen:

daeranilen:

daeranilen:

Earlier today, I served as the “young woman’s voice” in a panel of local experts at a Girl Scouts speaking event. One question for the panel was something to the effect of, “Should parents read their daughter’s texts or monitor her online activity for bad language and inappropriate content?”

I was surprised when the first panelist answered the question as if it were about cyberbullying. The adult audience nodded sagely as she spoke about the importance of protecting children online.

I reached for the microphone next. I said, “As far as reading your child’s texts or logging into their social media profiles, I would say 99.9% of the time, do not do that.”

Looks of total shock answered me. I actually saw heads jerk back in surprise. Even some of my fellow panelists blinked.

Everyone stared as I explained that going behind a child’s back in such a way severs the bond of trust with the parent. When I said, “This is the most effective way to ensure that your child never tells you anything,” it was like I’d delivered a revelation.

It’s easy to talk about the disconnect between the old and the young, but I don’t think I’d ever been so slapped in the face by the reality of it. It was clear that for most of the parents I spoke to, the idea of such actions as a violation had never occurred to them at all.

It alarms me how quickly adults forget that children are people.

Apparently people are rediscovering this post somehow and I think that’s pretty cool! Having experienced similar violations of trust in my youth, this is an important issue to me, so I want to add my personal story:

Around age 13, I tried to express to my mother that I thought I might have clinical depression, and she snapped at me “not to joke about things like that.” I stopped telling my mother when I felt depressed.

Around age 15, I caught my mother reading my diary. She confessed that any time she saw me write in my diary, she would sneak into my room and read it, because I only wrote when I was upset. I stopped keeping a diary.

Around age 18, I had an emotional breakdown while on vacation because I didn’t want to go to college. I ended up seeing a therapist for - surprise surprise - depression.

Around age 21, I spoke on this panel with my mother in the audience, and afterwards I mentioned the diary incident to her with respect to this particular Q&A. Her eyes welled up, and she said, “You know I read those because I was worried you were depressed and going to hurt yourself, right?”

TL;DR: When you invade your child’s privacy, you communicate three things:

  1. You do not respect their rights as an individual.
  2. You do not trust them to navigate problems or seek help on their own.
  3. You probably haven’t been listening to them.

Information about almost every issue that you think you have to snoop for can probably be obtained by communicating with and listening to your child.

Part of me is really excited to see that the original post got 200 notes because holy crap 200 notes, and part of me is really saddened that something so negative has resonated with so many people.

It alarms me how quickly adults forget children are people.

@adultprivilege

(via cryptiboy)

franzanth:

Can I use this image? - a layperson’s guide to intellectual property

So you’ve found a nice image on the internet and you want to use it. You’ve might have heard that “everything I find on the internet is free"—but it’s actually not the case.

Sure, the internet is vast and nobody will probably find out, but that doesn’t mean it’s acceptable. If you’re a good person who wants to support creators the right way, this guide is for you.

Read it in full here.

(Source: patreon.com, via cryptiboy)

42ismynumber:

kksshootingstar:

puto-el-que-lo–lea:

midnght-sxn:

sexaulity:

picsthatmakeyougohmm:

hmmm

Damn I wanna see the next guy over

what kind of wattpad shit

There’s so much going on here. 1)A dude painting the other dude from across him as if he were his muse, 2)said dude has been keeping the same pose and expression for as long as it took dude A to draw him. 3) Guy next to him is drawing what looks like a portrait of Death, maybe indicating that Death itself is somewhere in the room but out of frame 4)They look like high school students yet both of them happen to be able to draw really good in MS Paint 5)even though they are using a MOUSE
Like, what are probabilities of all this happening at the same time in the same room? This pic might as well be cursed

Also- why is the wall so fucked up? Where are they??

That’s just how public school is

(via trufflesmushroom)

nubbsgalore:

lachryphagy is the term used to describe the behaviour of tear drinking in nature, typically in environments - like the purvian amazon shown here - where sodium and other micronutrients are hard to find. 

bees and butterflies need sodium for egg production and metabolic purposes, but their diets of nectar are low in salt. so the orange julia and sulfur yellow butterflies you see here turn to the salty tears of often stationary turtles and caiman. 

and though the caiman and turtles seem to receive no reciprocal benefit from the interaction, they’re apparently happy enough to just help out. (x, x, x, x, x, x)

(via smatter)